# Porsche 944 hatch removal aerodynamics

Putting the car on a diet is one of the first to-do’s of any race car enthusiast. And that’s a sensible thing to do. As can be deduced from Newton’s first law of motion, for a given amount of force, less mass will result in a higher rate of acceleration. This, in consequence, would result in faster lap times.

This article arises from a blog reader’s question about Porsche 944s racing in lower categories. Specifically about the influence that removing the rear hatch has on aerodynamics; as in search of a lightweight body, many of the participants decide to remove the hatch, getting rid of 27 “unnecessary” kilograms.

The previous picture shows one of such participants. But,

Contents

## should we reduce weight at any cost?

On the one hand, we need to transmit the engine torque to the road surface. And this capacity of the tire for forward traction is proportional to the normal load applied to the tire. This normal load is the result of adding up weight and downforce; and is constantly varying.

On the other hand, the maximum speed and acceleration of the car is limited by the aerodynamic drag —among other forces—. Aerodynamic drag is the most limiting factor in straight line performance at speeds well above 100 km/h; but also plays an important role at lower speeds.

## Model setup

This study is based on a previous study on the influence of pop-up headlights on the aerodynamics of the Porsche 944. We take the same geometry —the model retrieved from GrabCAD included a representation of the cabin interior—, mesh settings and boundary conditions, so that results are comparable.

## Drag penalty

Let’s start with the other hand, aerodynamic drag. The following plot displays the accumulated drag drag coefficient and tells us where drag is building up. It is no surprise that most of the drag comes from the pressure delta between the exterior of the car and the interior of the cabin.

We can also visualize the total pressure to see where the losses are taking place. Just look at how the wake changes by removing the hatch. The flow detaches at the end of the roof, and a big bubble forms when the hatch is removed, while in remains attached to the rear window.

### ptot

Image 1 of 2

By removing the rear hatch we went from a Cx of 0.369 to 0.385, a 4.33 % increase; a little bit less than turning on the lights. Combining the two effects could potentially increase aerodynamic drag by 10 %; and that, we should notice.

Now, let’s got back to the one hand and see what happened to downforce.

## From downforce to lift

Yes, by removing the rear hatch we go from some downforce to having lift. This will reduce the traction capacity of the rear tires and have a negative impact on rear end stability at high speeds —the Porsche 944 follows a FR layout.

In the previous chart we can see that the hatch is generating some downforce close to the rear end of the car, thus increasing the normal force acting on the rear tires. From a Cz of -0.065 (downforce), by removing the hatch and spoiler, we go to 0.097 (lift).

It also helps to look at the front-rear lift distribution, in the table above. Removing the hatch and spoiler adds significant lift to the rear axle. If Cz doesn’t tell you much, 0.187 is equivalent to ~275 N pulling up at 126 km/h, or removing ~28 kg from the rear end; 70 kg at 200 km/h. On the other hand, 0.008 is just 3 kg at 200 km/h; almost nothing in comparison.

The following gallery shows the Porsche 944 coloured by cz, where blue indicates a contribution to downforce and red, a contribution towards lift.

### cz_cabin_bottom

Image 1 of 4

By removing the rear hatch and spoiler, we are also affecting the performance of the diffuser. In the pictures we can see that the diffuser area is of a lighter blue when removing the hatch. We can see in the following pictures that by removing the rear spoiler, we are not spoiling the downwash coming from the top of the car, moving the rear recirculation bubble and interfering with the diffuser’s exit.

Image 4 of 4

## Concluding remarks

While weight is a feature of our cars that we can easily measure and work on, aerodynamics —not being readily apparent—, is an aspect easily neglected. While it is tempting to subtract 27 kg from the car, by removing the hatch we are taking 55 kg at 126 km/h from the rear axle penalizing the tire’s capacity to produce traction —100 kg at 200 kg/h.

Although the representation of the underbody of the car is not accurate —thus the results are not necessarily representative of the actual Porsche 944 performance—, it is undeniable that the hatch contributes, at the very least, to reducing the lift, if not to generating net downforce. And this is as important as weight. Therefore, a compromise solution —more appropriate than eliminating exposed heavy components—, would be to replace them with lighter materials, keeping the shape and aerodynamic properties.

## References

Katz, J. (2006). Aerodynamics of race cars. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 38(1), 27–63.